SUPPLY-CHAIN PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN P&G AND WALMART
Major
changes in the fast-growing digital economy occurred in the traditional supply
chain and e-commerce company. Information technology has enabled channel
partners to trade items to share information, and integrate them, thus it will
reshape the dynamics of the organization and lead to more efficient channels.
Electronic data integration and automation of business practices would have
driven down costs and build sales with customer needs.
The
development of channel partnership between a manufacturer (Procter and Gamble,
or P&G) and retailer (Wal-Mart) .Both major players in their industries,
P&G and Wal-Mart found a way to leverage on information technology by
sharing data across their mutual supply chains. The result channel has become
more efficient because channel activities are better arranged. Reduced needs for
inventories but greater returns by focusing on selling what the customers want.
All in all, the supply chain between P&G and Wal-Mart has adopted a much
better customer focus through the channel partnership and it is mutually
beneficial.
The
power of inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) is well known in the
literature of information systems research and has proven to be an effective strategic
weapon. But the P&G and Wal-Mart partnership does further. To understand
the impact fully, one has to think about three progressive degrees of IOIS:
transactional, operational, and strategic. The strategic partnership is the
most involved, with the greatest commitments from the partners and requiring
the strongest trust. The two companies essentially stumbled into
it and then progressively built stronger collaboration as more benefits were
released.
To
fully understanding the role that technology has played in the
Procter&Gamble and Wal-Mart business relationship, an understanding of the
business relationship before 1988 is needed. The business situation in 1988
between P&G and Wal-Mart was broken. The business itself was $375 million
and growing. Athough, the business relationship between the two companies was
poor. P & G had organized itself into 12 different internal product
divisions. Each division had different sales managers that would separately and
independently call on Wal-Mart. These individuals were accountable for the
sales results of each division and never came together to represent P&G as
a whole. At that time, the relationship between P&G and
Wal-Mart was characterized as anything but collaborative. As a matter of fact,
their relationship was adversarial, obsessed by day-to-day transactions.
Furthermore, their business relationship was conducted through fragmented
processes.
Looking
back over the ten-year period between Wal-Mart and P&G, information
technology has created a common language, driven down costs, and provided an
avenue for increased sales for the P&G and Wal-Mart partnership. Several
key lessons learned for understanding the role that Information Technology can
play in the manufacturer / supplier relation.
No comments:
Post a Comment